Institutional compliance hub
Engineering readiness path for regulated participants on Chain 138 — aligned with the DBIS institution onboarding charter and jurisdiction compliance matrices.
Informational engineering readiness only — not legal advice, a regulatory determination, or an audit certificate. Counsel owns statutory interpretation.
Legal tracks (do not conflate)
Track A · Counsel signed — checklist A–I
Track A — Order capacity
Does SMOM have capacity to charter under Order law?
International legal personality, GUOSMM Tier 1 acts, prohibited-claims register.
Counsel corpusTrack B · WP-1–5 signed (sovereign governmental scope)
Track B — Operational transactability
Can entities operate and settle in external jurisdictions?
Banking, AML, correspondent, Indonesia perimeter, US-CO-OMNL matrices.
Counsel corpusOnboarding journey
Institution onboarding charter, RACI, and in-scope jurisdictions.
Read charter →Entity profile, regulators, licensed activities — counsel-owned law inventory.
Start screening →Per-jurisdiction obligation → control → evidence mapping.
View matrices →Register policyProfileId, manifest resources, RTGS evidence.
URA profiles →Matrix sign-off, evidence packages, settlement verify.
Settlement verify →Jurisdiction matrices
Technology provider + licensed partners; BNI live contract operator-gated
Matrix → · Perimeter →WP-1 complete (10/10 rows); MSB not required for current institutional scope; live correspondent/FI contracts operator-gated
Matrix →Prohibited external claims
- No automatic national license equivalence
- No compelled SWIFT / Fedwire / BIS access from personality alone
- No BIS replacement or supranational regulatory authority claims
Public DD and transparency
Use the transparency page for external reviewers. It reduces ambiguity by separating live, pilot, planned, and blocked items.
Open transparency page